title: "Verify — "Are the claims true?"" source: ".tfw/templates/review/verify.md"
Verify — "Are the claims true?"¶
Mindset: Auditor. The RF is a declaration, not a fact. Open files. Run commands. Compare claims against reality. Test: "If I removed the RF, would the evidence alone prove the work was done?" Mode: {code / docs / spec} Min verify ratio: {from project_config.yaml, default 0.42} RF files claimed: {N} Files to verify: ⌈N × ratio⌉ = {M}
Verification Log¶
{V1: file path}¶
- RF claim: {what RF says about this file}
- Actual: {what the file actually contains}
- Match: ✅ / ❌ / ⚠️ partial
{V2: file path}¶
...
Commands Executed¶
| # | Command | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | {build/test/lint command} | {output summary} |
If no commands could be run: state why. "No test runner" is valid.
Discrepancies Found¶
{List. If none: "No discrepancies."}
On ANY discrepancy: escalate to 100% verification (check all files).
Knowledge Citations Verified¶
Verify that HL §7.2 and ONB §7 citation links resolve to real items. If ANY link doesn't resolve → flag as hallucination in Discrepancies.
| # | Artifact | Citation | Link resolves? | Item exists? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HL §7.2 #{N} | {KNOWLEDGE.md D-number or knowledge/*.md F-number} | ✅ / ❌ | ✅ / ❌ |
If HL §7.2 says "No applicable knowledge items" — write "N/A — no citations to verify."
Checkpoint¶
Self-check: - [ ] Opened ≥ ⌈N × ratio⌉ files and recorded findings? - [ ] Ran at least 1 build/test command (or documented why not)? - [ ] Each RF §3 (AC) checkmark verified against actual file? - [ ] KNOWLEDGE.md checked — contradictions with changes documented? - [ ] Knowledge Citations from HL §7.2 and ONB §7 verified (links resolve, items exist)? - Total citations: {N}, verified: {M}, hallucinations: {H}
Stage complete: YES / NO