Skip to content

title: "Map — "What was done?"" source: "tasks/TFW-55__canonization_program/phase-b/review/phase-b2/revision-1/map.md"


Map — "What was done?"

Mindset: Experienced newcomer. You arrived after someone else's work. Understand before you judge. No opinions yet — only comprehension. Test: "Can I explain what was done to someone who hasn't read the RF?" Review cycle: Formal return #1 / revision #1 Review target: abed57f993e58cb3e6147eda9de8246c5aa1f206 Target parent: 36075b486ae2adffeb7d19293f16606d3cc22a3f Prior REVIEW commit: f02c240dcd9a471e209dc1bc106ff15968ad4854 RF: RF Phase B.2 TS: TS Phase B.2

Understanding

The Executor retained the corrective Phase B.2 product direction—restore the historic practical project guide and provide complete Russian and Kazakh localizations—and addressed the three bounded findings from formal REVIEW return #1. The new exact objects replace the Russian duty-to-stop wording with retained responsibility for the human stop decision, use canonical ❌ BLOCKED in EN/RU/KK, and restore the approved Evidence classification of 0 VERIFIED / 0 DEFERRED / 0 BLOCKED / 9 N/A while preserving deterministic repository checks as verification.

The same Russian and Kazakh critics report complete exact-object re-reads at freeze 36075b486ae2adffeb7d19293f16606d3cc22a3f; the Russian report explicitly preserves and acknowledges its prior acceptance error. The Executor updated only the bounded return paths and the TFW-55 Task Board row. The first-cycle canonical REVISE and raw review/phase-b2/{map,verify,judge}.md objects remain byte-identical at the review target and visible in Git history.

TS ↔ RF Alignment

TS requirement Revised RF claim Aligned?
AC-1 — exact b924926 baseline, complete disposition ledger, classified changes, current board source RF §3 retains the 1,485-word baseline/SHA, complete ledger, and exact board-source checks ✅ claimed
AC-2 — English remains a practical guide with all newcomer functions RF §§1–4 retain the seven-question walkthrough and functional growth account ✅ claimed
AC-3 — minimal philosophy, human authority, bounded agents, selected Trace, essay route RF §3 reports the compact definition and human stop-decision boundary without essay duplication ✅ claimed
AC-4 — current Editions, starts, commands, lifecycle, paths, anchors, and links RF §§2–4 report canonical ❌ BLOCKED, 11 commands, 35 targets/language, and exact source parity ✅ claimed
AC-5 — complete natural Russian localization RF §§2–5 cite corrected responsibility/decision semantics and same-critic full-object acceptance ✅ claimed
AC-6 — complete natural Kazakh localization RF §§2–5 cite full parity, canonical lifecycle token, and same-critic full-object acceptance ✅ claimed
AC-7 — complete critic lineage and unresolved HIGH 0/0 RF §§2–4 identify draft, first-final, and REVIEW-return exact blobs and full rechecks ✅ claimed
AC-8 — language switch, English-only board, UTF-8, source and protected-object integrity RF §§3–4 retain one EN/zero localized boards, tail/TFW-60, essay blob, old-chain, link, encoding, and scope gates ✅ claimed
AC-9 — corrective provenance, honest trace, no placeholders/BoK, D66 deferred RF §§1–6 and §10 record return #1, nine N/A Evidence rows, scope, exclusions, and post-APPROVE D66 disposition ✅ claimed

Formal Return #1 Disposition Map

Prior finding Executor correction claimed Required independent recheck
RU authority drift Definition and How-It-Works now say ответственность ... за решение об остановке работы; RU critic acknowledges the prior error and supplies a fresh back-translation Exact freeze blob, both production locations, critic lineage, acknowledgement, full-read claim, semantic table, unresolved HIGH 0
Non-canonical ⛔ BLOCKED EN/RU/KK now teach ❌ BLOCKED Exact objects against conventions, glossary, project config, localized parity, and zero stale glyphs
Nine repository checks misclassified as Evidence EV E1–E9 and RF §5 now use N/A; useful results remain verification Exact TS Evidence fields, every EV row/final tally, RF tally/wording, and absence of operating/reception Evidence claims

Deviations from TS

No product or contract deviation is claimed. Across the full Phase B.2 implementation lineage the RF counts twelve changed paths: the eight Executor-authorized paths plus four first-cycle Reviewer artifacts incorporated through the formal return history. For revision #1 itself, f02c240d…abed57f… changes seven bounded Executor paths; the four prior review objects are unchanged, and this second review uses a new review/phase-b2/revision-1/ stage directory.

The persistent Kazakh пен preference remains explicitly LOW and non-blocking. Missing TFW-55 Iteration 2/TFW-54 citations and stale D66 remain pre-existing, disclosed, and outside this Executor return. No size ceiling, target band, BoK work, research reconstruction, mechanics change, Edition change, or post-APPROVE docs work is claimed.

Checkpoint

Self-check: - [x] Read revised RF §1–§10 completely? - [x] Read TS DoD and matched every AC to the revised RF? - [x] Read the master contract baseline, Phase HL, Project North Star, and required PV context? - [x] Read ONB and confirmed no unresolved blocking question? - [x] Read both revised full language reports and all three exact current guides? - [x] Verified first-cycle REVIEW/stage blobs are byte-identical at the new target?

Stage complete: YES