Skip to content

title: "Map — "What was done?"" source: "tasks/TFW-41__execution_quality_gates/PhaseD/review/map.md"


Map — "What was done?"

Mindset: Experienced newcomer. You arrived after someone else's work. Understand before you judge. No opinions yet — only comprehension. Test: "Can I explain what was done to someone who hasn't read the RF?" RF: RF__PhaseD__glossary_and_adapters.md TS: TS__PhaseD__glossary_and_adapters.md Mode: code

Understanding

The executor added 15 terms (14 from TS + 1 coordinator-approved addition "Alternative") to .tfw/glossary.md in two new sections: ## Execution Gates and ## Research — Dimensional Analysis. The executor also performed a verbatim overwrite sync of four Antigravity adapter files (.agent/workflows/tfw-handoff.md, tfw-plan.md, tfw-review.md, tfw-research.md) against their corresponding source workflows in .tfw/workflows/. One blocking ONB question was raised (14 vs 15 terms: TS AC-1 listed 14 but HL §4 deliverables listed 15 including "Alternative"); the coordinator resolved this by designating the HL deliverables list as authoritative.

TS ↔ RF Alignment

TS requirement RF claim Aligned?
AC-1: 14 terms in glossary 15 terms added (coordinator-approved: HL is authoritative)
AC-2: tfw-handoff.md matches source Verbatim overwrite from session
AC-2: tfw-plan.md matches source Verbatim overwrite from session
AC-2: tfw-review.md matches source Verbatim overwrite from session
AC-2: tfw-research.md matches source Verbatim overwrite from session
AC-2 depends on AC-1 ([depends: AC-1]) Glossary terms added first, adapters synced after
Terminology: no Zwicky/GMA/morphological terms All 5 dimensional analysis definitions confirmed clean
DoF: any 14 terms missing → reject All 15 present
DoF: domain-specific examples in definitions → reject Definitions use domain-neutral language
DoF: adapter differs from source → reject Claim: verbatim match (requires verification) 🔍

Deviations from TS

  1. 15 terms instead of 14 — TS §2 scope said "14 new terms"; executor found "Alternative" omitted from TS AC-1 but present in HL §4 deliverables list. Raised as ONB blocking question, coordinator confirmed HL is authoritative. Deviation is documented in RF §2 Decision 1 with source. Compliant with process.

Checkpoint

Self-check: - [x] Read RF §1-§5 completely? - [x] Read TS DoD and matched each item to RF §3? - [x] Read HL §7 Principles — can I state the design philosophy? - [x] Read ONB — were blocking questions resolved?

Stage complete: YES