---

title: "Verify — "Are the claims true?"" source: "tasks/TFW-60__conflict_resistant_shared_workspace/phase-a/review/verify.md"

---

Verify — "Are the claims true?"

Mindset: Auditor. The RF is a declaration, not a fact. Open files. Run commands. Compare claims against reality. Test: "If I removed the RF, would the evidence alone prove the work was done?" Min verify ratio: 0.42 RF files claimed: 73 authored product files (45 modified + 28 new), excluding propagated copies and task traces Files to verify initially: ⌈73 × 0.42⌉ = 31 Escalation: the first evidence discrepancy triggered 100% verification. All 103 paths changed from baseline 80d6a16 through HEAD were inspected by full diff, content read, or byte-copy comparison.

Verification Log

#	Surface	Files checked	RF claim	Actual	Match
V1	Canonical rules, configuration, release	8	The core declares task-local state, both identifier grammars, and release 2.0.0 consistently	Core direction is present, but the release contains false collision claims; .tfw/templates/project_config.yaml still says version: "0.8.4"	❌
V2	Canonical templates	17	Templates use {ID} and describe the new carriers without legacy residue	New carrier templates exist. REVIEW.md still requires initial_seq; the journal filename collides for equal second + equal kind; the project-config template has the old version	❌
V3	Canonical workflows	7	Every lifecycle workflow uses the shipped model	plan.md creates a clock ID but immediately reads removed tfw.initial_seq; init.md still teaches {PREFIX}-1 in seven live places and contains orphaned RND-2/RND-3 table rows; handoff.md retains the legacy EV filename; resume.md retains {PREFIX}-{N}	❌
V4	Adapter originals	10	Adapter originals describe the new context model	The Codex entry-point change is present. It loads status.md but omits the selected task's journal/; propagated workflow defects remain because adapters route to those canonical workflows	⚠️ partial
V5	Installed adapter copies	24	Installed copies are synchronized from their canonical sources	The 14 changed Antigravity/Claude workflow copies and 8 changed Codex skills checked against their sources are byte-identical where declared. The copies faithfully propagate the canonical defects	✅ copy integrity / ❌ semantics
V6	Documentation scripts and tests	6	One resolver supports both grammars and every configured container; tests cover the release	gen_index.py finds both layouts, but gen_docs.py still matches only {task_prefix}-N, globs only tasks/, and groups tasks/2026/<task> under 2026. Tests exercise the legacy corpus and miss the new layout	❌
V7	Migrated task corpus and task traces	23	Eleven live states ship; every authority resolves; accounting is exact and reproducible	Only 10 state files are tracked. TFW-36's state is ignored by *. TFW-54's committed state points to an untracked HL. Current accounting was regenerated after board removal and no longer contains the claimed 61/53 reconciliation	❌
V8	Root entry points	4	README/AGENTS/CLAUDE/RELEASE route to task state and no longer depend on the board	Board removal and route are present. The root entry points are broadly aligned; this does not repair the contradictory canonical init/update/review instructions	⚠️ partial
V9	Team profiles	3 executor paths	Human and agent principals have declared attribution	saubakirov and claude-code profiles are valid. No lifecycle workflow actually performs the binding resolution before its first durable write	⚠️ partial
V10	Portfolio index	1	Deterministic, derived, 11 sources, current	It is deterministic for identical working-tree inputs. Its committed 11-source result depends on ignored TFW-36 state and an untracked TFW-54 HL; a clean checkout has different inputs. A legitimate task-local transition makes the mandatory test_committed_index_is_current fail until the shared index is rewritten	❌
V11	RF and evidence traces	6	Evidence is internally consistent and supports 43 VERIFIED claims	All files exist, but the migration artifact was overwritten, the ceiling population conflicts across four locations, and several fixtures test weaker cases than their claims	❌
V12	Reviewer identity exception	1 reviewer-added path	N/A — not executor output	team/codex.md was added during review on the owner's explicit instruction so the reviewer can write an honest journal actor. It is excluded from executor-surface judgment	⚪ N/A

Commands Executed

#	Command	Result
1	python -m pytest docs/scripts/ -q	129 passed, 1 skipped in 34.50s
2	python docs/scripts/gen_index.py --check	index up to date: workspace/00-INDEX.md for the current dirty working tree
3	python -m pytest docs/scripts/ -q --collect-only	130 tests collected
4	git diff --name-status 80d6a16..HEAD + grouped full-diff audit	103 changed paths: 79 non-installed-copy paths + 24 installed adapter paths; all inspected after escalation
5	SHA-256 comparison of canonical workflows/Codex skill originals against installed copies	All checked declared copies were byte-identical
6	rg sweep for {PREFIX}, initial_seq, Task Board, and hardcoded tasks/ across workflows/templates/adapters/scripts	Live residue found in init.md, plan.md, update.md, handoff.md, resume.md, REVIEW.md, and all propagated copies; hardcoded task paths found in gen_docs.py and migrate_board.py
7	Targeted temp-tree probe of gen_docs.resolve_references("RF 20260826-120000")	Output remained plain text although the clock-ID RF existed under workspace/2026/…
8	Targeted malformed-state probe of gen_index.read_status()	A state missing goal, value, created, and updated was accepted without _error
9	Targeted task-index grouping probe	tasks/2026/20260826-120000__demo/status.md groups under key 2026, not the task ID
10	git ls-files 'tasks/*/status.md' + ignored check	10 tracked states; tasks/[TFW-36](../../../TFW-36__content_marketing_blog_series/)…/status.md is ignored by the task's * rule
11	git cat-file -e HEAD:<authority> for every migrated status	All committed authorities exist except TFW-54; that status resolves only because the current worktree contains an unrelated untracked HL
12	git log --oneline -- evidence/migration_accounting.md and historical blob read	Correct 61/53 accounting existed at b094943; commit c00c4bc overwrote it with a post-removal 0/53 result
13	Current git diff --name-status 80d6a16..HEAD -- tasks/	23 additions, not the 14 additions stated in E23's alleged current-HEAD output
14	Current commit-subject recount	283 subjects name a task, not the fixed 278 in E30/RF; TFW-37 remains the single historically named identifier without a directory
15	After the review's normal RF → REV task-local transition: gen_index.py --check and pytest …::test_committed_index_is_current	Both exit 1: the shared index is stale and the build test fails until that aggregate is rewritten

Passing tests establish that the tested cases still pass. They do not establish the missing same-second/same-kind, mutually-offline, clean-checkout, full-status-schema, or year-nested documentation cases.

Claim & Source Checks

#	Claim / citation checked	Where it appears	Traces to	Holds?
C1	“Two participants who create a task while offline from each other cannot produce two directories carrying the same ID”	Master HL DoD 18; TS AC-2; RF §3	Identifier grammar YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS; fixture uses 12:00:00 and 12:00:01	❌ — equal wall-clock seconds produce the same ID while neither participant can observe the other
C2	“Two participants appending concurrently produce two files and no contended write”	TS AC-3; RF §3; EV E8	Journal grammar YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS__{kind}.md; fixture uses dispatch and handoff	❌ — equal second + equal kind produces one pathname
C3	“Both grammars are readable by every consumer”	TS AC-2; RF §3/§1; EV E7	gen_index.parse_identifier; gen_docs.resolve_references	❌ — only gen_index is shown; the docs resolver rejects clock IDs and hardcodes legacy paths
C4	“61 rows + 53 directories … 53 matched, 8 board-only”	EV E22; RF §3	Current evidence/migration_accounting.md and its Git history	❌ — the current artifact says 0 rows/53 directories; the supporting historical blob was overwritten
C5	“Every authority resolves to a file that exists”	EV E25	Migrated status files against the committed HEAD tree	❌ — TFW-54 points to an untracked HL and is broken in a clean checkout
C6	“The ceiling population is 272 + 63 = 335; 3 exceed”	RF/EV/template/changelog	ceiling_measurement.txt	❌ — the attachment measures 280 + 63 = 343 and later says “3 of 335” internally
C7	“Quick Start, canonical rules, glossary, templates and adapter originals carry no residue”	EV E42; RF §3	Repository-wide residue sweep	❌ — multiple live instructions still allocate/use initial_seq or {PREFIX}-1; template version remains 0.8.4
C8	“The committed index has 11 task state sources”	workspace/00-INDEX.md; RF §1	Git-tracked states and ignored files	❌ — only 10 states ship; the eleventh is ignored and absent from a clone
C9	“Project-level views … [are not] edited by every workflow transition” and “Different tasks synchronize without a common edit”	Master HL §3.1/§3.2	test_committed_index_is_current after the review transition	❌ — the normal local transition makes the build red until workspace/00-INDEX.md is rewritten, reintroducing one shared edit for every task

Discrepancies Found

1. F1 — AC-2 is internally unsatisfiable as written. A seconds-only timestamp cannot guarantee uniqueness between mutually offline creators. The TS simultaneously fixes the grammar and requires a property that the grammar cannot provide. The fixture avoids the collision by assigning different seconds and therefore does not test the requirement.
2. F2 — The shipped creation workflows do not implement their claimed collision protocol. plan.md and init.md say to take the clock; neither defines identifier-level existence checks, bounded retry, backwards-clock behavior, or fail-visible output. The non-shipped fixture cannot substitute for the released workflow.
3. F3 — AC-3's journal filename is not concurrency-safe. YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS__{kind}.md collides when two writers use the same kind in the same second. E8 only demonstrates different kinds.
4. F4 — Participant resolution is demonstrated only in a non-shipped harness. The lifecycle workflows do not resolve the acting profile before their first durable write. During this review, multiple profiles and no binding did not provide a valid Codex handle until the owner explicitly authorized adding one.
5. F5 — AC-4's “no private preferences in the shared tree” condition conflicts with this repository's existing .user_preferences.md. Git ignore does not make a file synchronization-ignore. The fixture's empty temp tree does not establish the repository condition.
6. F6 — The status reader does not enforce the declared closed schema. It omits required goal, value, created, updated, lifecycle vocabulary/conditional keys, terminal outcome, date/type validation, and directory-ID consistency. Malformed live state can become authoritative instead of unresolved.
7. F7 — gen_docs.py is not migrated to the new model. Artifact, phase, HL, and bare-ID resolvers hardcode tasks/ and the legacy prefix grammar. Its tasks index treats the creation year as the task folder. Green integration tests contain no year-nested clock-ID fixture.
8. F8 — Clean-checkout migration completeness fails. Ten states are tracked, not eleven; TFW-36 is ignored, while TFW-54's authority was selected from an unrelated untracked file and is absent at HEAD.
9. F9 — The required migration accounting evidence was overwritten. The current artifact no longer supports E21/E22 and the migration is not re-runnable after the board is removed. The script also hardcodes tasks/BOARD-SNAPSHOT.md, the index link, the TFW-60 title, and --today 2026-08-26.
10. F10 — The release surface contains live legacy residue. init.md, plan.md, update.md, handoff.md, resume.md, templates/REVIEW.md, their propagated copies, and the 0.8.4 template version contradict the 2.0.0 release claim.
11. F11 — AC-7 contradicts AC-1 inside the TS. AC-1 mandates <container>/<YYYY>/<id>__<slug>/; AC-7 says new and legacy tasks are at the same depth below root. Both cannot hold without changing one clause.
12. F12 — Evidence counts are stale or inconsistent. E23 reports 14 task additions where current HEAD has 23; E30 reports 278 task-naming subjects where the current recount has 283; the journal population is 343 in the attachment and 335 elsewhere.
13. F13 — The green suite has coverage gaps aligned with the failures. There are no tests for mutually offline same-second creation, same-kind journal append, full status schema, clean-checkout migration output, clock-ID docs resolution, or year-nested docs grouping.
14. F14 — Safety process failure recurred. Broad staging temporarily committed unrelated TFW-54/TFW-55 work. It was repaired without deleting the working-tree files, but this is a second concrete instance of existing TD-144.
15. F15 — The build gate makes the derived index a shared transition hot spot. Immediately after the reviewer changed only TFW-60's status.md, gen_index.py --check and test_committed_index_is_current failed. Keeping the required suite green therefore requires every task transition to rewrite workspace/00-INDEX.md, directly contradicting master HL §3.1 (“without being edited by every workflow transition”) and §3.2 (“Different tasks synchronize without a common edit”).

Any one discrepancy requires full verification; all 103 changed paths were consequently checked.

Evidence Verification

#	RF Evidence ref	Artifact exists?	Matches claim?
E1	fixture AC-1 path stability	✅	✅ — supports the fixture path claim
E2	fixture AC-1 year stability	✅	✅
E3	fixture + container unit test	✅	❌ — only proves gen_index configuration; hardcoded tasks/ remains elsewhere
E4	fixture empty-container creation	✅	⚠️ — proves no counter in that harness, not offline uniqueness or shipped workflow behavior
E5	fixture visible collision	✅	⚠️ — proves a collision visible in one tree, not mutually offline collision
E6	fixture bounded retry	✅	⚠️ — algorithm exists only in the non-shipped fixture transcript
E7	test_parse_identifier	✅	❌ — proves one parser, not every consumer
E8	fixture concurrent append	✅	❌ — different kinds produce different names; same-kind contention is untested
E9	fixture over-ceiling refusal	✅	⚠️ — no released workflow implements the refusal gate
E10	fixture correction event	✅	✅
E11	ceiling attachment	✅	❌ — 280/63/343 in the attachment versus 272/63/335 in the claim; attachment is internally inconsistent
E12	identity fixture	✅	❌ — no shipped lifecycle workflow invokes this resolution; the live review exposed the gap
E13	identity fixture	✅	❌ — the real project tree contains .user_preferences.md
E14	identity fixture	✅	⚠️ — design rule is documented, but no consumer is implemented
E15	agent profile fixture/repository	✅	✅ — claude-code has its own profile
E16	explicit deferral	✅	✅ — the DEFERRED status is honest and bounded
E17	deterministic index tests	✅	✅ — identical inputs produce identical bytes
E18	current index header	✅	⚠️ — true for the dirty tree, not for clean HEAD inputs
E19	unresolved section	✅	✅ — unresolved legacy directories are visible
E20	four-condition fixture	✅	⚠️ — malformed coverage omits most required schema rules
E21	migration accounting	✅	❌ — current artifact no longer records the pre-write run
E22	migration reconciliation	✅	❌ — current artifact says 0 rows/53 directory-only
E23	inline task diff	⚠️ inline only	❌ — current baseline-to-HEAD result is 23 additions, not 14
E24	migration negative tests	✅	✅ — temp-tree non-overwrite behavior is established
E25	migration tests + repository	✅	❌ — TFW-54 authority is absent from committed HEAD
E26	status files + test	✅	✅ — the two legacy values are carried verbatim
E27	board snapshot	✅	✅ — 61 rows are retained in the snapshot
E28	inline link recount	⚠️ inline only	⚠️ — no persistent checker/output; new year-nested docs layout is not exercised
E29	inline placeholder relation	⚠️ inline only	⚠️ — plausible for five placeholders, but does not establish all relative links
E30	inline commit-subject recount	⚠️ inline only	❌ — current count is 283, illustrating the fixed-count drift the TS warned about
E31	tasks/README.md	✅	✅
E32	board sweep	✅	✅ — remaining “Task Board” mentions in the scoped sweep are historical/migration context
E33	integration test + code	✅	✅ — the board parser was removed
E34	reintroduction test	✅	✅
E35	rewritten integration tests	✅	✅
E36	pytest/MkDocs integration	✅	✅ — build passes for the current corpus
E37	file-only lifecycle fixture	✅	✅ — no runtime is required for the fixture
E38	absent-index fixture	✅	✅
E39	changed executable surface	✅	✅ — no daemon/database/lock service was added
E40	VERSION + live config	✅	✅ for those two files; template-version contradiction is recorded under F10
E41	CHANGELOG	✅	✅ for presence, breaking-change statement, and one-list migration form
E42	residue sweep	✅	❌ — live legacy instructions and version residue remain
E43	board-parser code/test	✅	✅ — the mechanism behind TD-81/TD-177 is removed, though registry closure waits
E44	full test suite	✅	⚠️ — command result reproduced, but the suite does not cover the failed guarantees

Evidence audit summary: 22 match, 10 partial, 12 contradicted, 0 missing. E16 remains correctly DEFERRED; “artifact exists” is not the same as “claim established.”

Knowledge Citations Verified

All 29 coordinator citations in master HL §7.2 and all five ONB-added items were resolved and checked. Priority 0 and 1 were checked separately against the current North Star texts.

#	Artifact	Priority + exact citation	Link resolves?	Item exists?	Meaning matches?	Relevant to asserted application?
1	HL/ONB #1	PV 0 — README.md opening + § How It Works	✅	✅	✅ — durable state/journal resume	❌ — ONB note discusses approval headers, not resumability
2	HL/ONB #2	PV 0 — .tfw/README.md thesis/success criteria	✅	✅	✅ — durable checkpoint and bounded delegation	❌ — ONB note discusses the file-budget ruling, not the cited purpose
3	HL/ONB #3–5	PV 1 — structural enforcement, one authority, portability	✅	✅	✅	✅ — tests/authority boundary/file-only carrier are relevant
4	HL/ONB #6–10	PV 2 — F4/F11/F27/F34/F38	✅	✅	✅	✅, with #9 correctly N/A for execution
5	HL/ONB #11	PV 3 — D31/D50 locality	✅	✅	✅	✅
6	HL/ONB #12	PV 3 — D37 exclusive knowledge territories	✅	✅	✅	❌ — the ONB application note is the FROZEN-status ruling and does not apply D37
7	HL/ONB #13–17	PV 3/4 — D43/D55/D59/D65; conventions §§3–5/13/14	✅	✅	✅	✅
8	HL/ONB #18–21	PV 5–7 — F22, F7/F30, risk F1, constraint F1/F3	✅	✅	✅	✅, with provider/Git item #20 correctly N/A after A3
9	HL/ONB #22–29	RES sources and comparative inputs	✅	✅	✅	✅ for applied/N/A routing after A3
10	ONB N1–N5	D66, D3–D5, README live prose, RELEASE checklist, Assisted edition	✅	✅	✅	✅ — each names a concrete migration or compatibility risk

Totals: 34 citations, 34 resolved, 31 semantically relevant applications, 3 irrelevant applications, 0 hallucinated. The three irrelevant applications are an independent D43 cascade failure and were included in the 100% escalation.

Checkpoint

Self-check: - [x] Opened ≥ ⌈73 × 0.42⌉ files and recorded findings? Full escalation covered all 103 changed paths. - [x] Ran at least 1 build/test command? - [x] Claim & Source Checks filled — key claims traced to primary artifacts and current Git state? - [x] Each RF §3 (AC) checkmark verified against actual file? - [x] KNOWLEDGE.md checked — contradictions with changes documented? - [x] Knowledge Citations from HL §7.2 and ONB §7 verified? - Total: 34, resolved: 34, semantically verified: 31, irrelevant: 3, hallucinated: 0 - [x] Evidence artifacts from RF §5 verified? - Total evidence items: 44, matched: 22, partial: 10, contradicted: 12, missing: 0

Stage complete: YES