Skip to content

Map — TFW-60 / Phase A review revision 4

Mindset: Map. Establish the contract, supported operating model, and review surface before judging the result.

Review identity

  • Reviewer: saubakirov, via Codex
  • RF: RF__phase-a__task_state_and_coordination.md, revision 3
  • TS: TS__phase-a__task_state_and_coordination.md, revision 5
  • Implementation snapshot claimed and independently resolved: afd24f5
  • Report commit at review start: 26f0df4
  • Historical verdicts are inputs, not files to replace: first review, revision 2, and revision 3

Owner-directed boundary

This is a quality-only review. By explicit owner direction:

  • file counts, line counts, diff size, scope-budget ratios, and census volume are excluded from the verdict;
  • the prior formal budget approval remains settled and is not re-litigated;
  • deliberately writing records in a retired grammar, deliberately corrupting profiles, or otherwise trying to defeat the rules is not part of the operating model being judged;
  • ordinary supported TFW workflows, ordinary configuration, migration, compatibility, validation, reproducibility, and accidental errors named by the TS remain in scope.

No volume assertion can make this review pass or fail.

Contract map

The master purpose remains task locality: different tasks must advance without a common edit, and another participant must be able to discover the task's live state from filesystem traces. The Phase HL narrows that purpose to task-local status, immutable journal events, participant attribution, migration, and a derived non-authoritative index. TS revision 5 adds the bounded third-pass corrections in AC-14.

The quality-critical third-pass obligations are:

Obligation Accepted behavior
Participant accountability Production validation refuses a current event when team/ is absent or empty, rejects undeclared actors, and requires on_behalf_of to resolve to a declared human
Legacy compatibility Immutable pre-2.0.0 actorless records remain readable; the current published grammar is actor-bearing
Production-path coverage Tests drive both collect and --validate, rather than proving only an injected helper path
Canonical naming {ID} means the complete clock-and-slug identifier; canonical event examples include the actor
Evidence reproducibility RF and EV name a resolved implementation commit and provide rerunnable commands against it

Previous finding disposition

Revision 3 item Revision 4 mapping
Identity validation failed open and discarded profile type Closed in production paths: the empty/missing-team, undeclared-actor, agent-accountability, and declared-human cases are exercised and behave as specified
Canonical naming had two meanings Closed: current instructions and templates use the whole identifier and actor-bearing event grammar; the regression guard covers the shipped surface
RF/EV mixed changing snapshots Closed: the evidence is pinned to afd24f5, which resolves independently and is distinct from the later report commit

Quality surface inspected

The inspection covered the current HL/TS/RF/EV chain; implementation at the pinned snapshot; the state, journal, profile, migration, and index paths; shipped workflow/template surfaces; tests for both direct rules and production entry points; the release-facing documentation hierarchy; adapter parity; current repository state; and every prior review item.

The exploratory possibility of hand-constructing a current record with the retired actorless filename, or hand-corrupting a profile specifically to evade its declaration, is not promoted to a finding. It is outside the owner-directed non-adversarial operating model and is not how the current workflows instruct a record to be written.

Contract and citation integrity

The master HL, Phase HL, TS, RF, EV, and ONB references resolve. The citation-bearing surfaces did not change in the third corrective pass. Revision 3's disclosed historical ONB relevance discrepancy remains exactly that: preserved historical understanding, explicitly routed in RF observation 12, and not a defect introduced or concealed by this result.

Stage complete: YES