Skip to content

TS — TFW-18 / Phase B: Knowledge Quality

Дата: 2026-04-03 Автор: Coordinator (AI) Статус: 🟡 TS_DRAFT — Ожидает апрува Parent HL: HL-[TFW-18](HL-TFW-18__knowledge_consolidation.md) Phase B

1. Цель

Reframe Fact Candidates guidance from technical to strategic across all templates and workflows. Ensure .tfw/README.md reflects the knowledge consolidation system added in Phase A.

2. Scope

In Scope

  • Reframe FC prompt in 3 templates (RF, REVIEW, RES) + 2 workflows (research, handoff)
  • Expand §10.1 category examples in conventions.md
  • Sharpen knowledge.md gather guidance
  • Add knowledge system to .tfw/README.md

Out of Scope

  • Changing the consolidation process itself (Phase A — already works)
  • Changing category names (already right in glossary)
  • Adding new categories

3. Затрагиваемые файлы

Файл Действие Описание
.tfw/templates/RF.md MODIFY §6 FC: reframe prompt + examples
.tfw/templates/REVIEW.md MODIFY §5 FC: same reframe
.tfw/templates/RES.md MODIFY §FC: same reframe
.tfw/workflows/research.md MODIFY §Closure L110: one-line reframe
.tfw/workflows/handoff.md MODIFY L81-87: reorder + reframe
.tfw/conventions.md MODIFY §10.1: expand category examples
.tfw/workflows/knowledge.md MODIFY Phase 2: sharpen gather guidance
.tfw/README.md MODIFY §v3 + workflows table: add knowledge + config

Бюджет: 0 новых файлов, 8 модификаций. Defaults: max 14 files, max 8 new, max 1200 LOC.

4. Детальные шаги

Step 1: Reframe FC in RF.md §6

Replace L51-56:

> **Before writing Fact Candidates, review the conversation history.** The human's
> messages are the primary source of strategic knowledge — domain insights, stakeholder
> priorities, business context, and constraints that shape decisions.
>
> Good: "18% clients = 80% revenue (Pareto)", "stakeholder: find problem clients first"
> NOT fact candidates: "project uses git", "code is in Python", implementation details (→ §5 Observations → tfw-docs)
> These are NOT verified facts. They become facts after `/tfw-knowledge` consolidation.

Step 2: Reframe FC in REVIEW.md §5

Same text as Step 1. Replace L53-58.

Step 3: Reframe FC in RES.md §Fact Candidates

Replace L116-121:

> **Before writing Fact Candidates, review the conversation history.** The human's
> messages are the primary source of strategic knowledge — domain insights, stakeholder
> priorities, business context, and constraints that shape decisions.
>
> Record strategic facts about THIS project — not findings about alternatives,
> not implementation details (those belong in tfw-docs).

Step 4: Reframe in research.md §Closure L110

Replace the FC bullet:

3. **Fact Candidates** — **review the full conversation history first.** Extract strategic knowledge — domain patterns, stakeholder priorities, business context. Technical observations belong in tfw-docs, not here

Step 5: Reframe in handoff.md L81-87

Replace:

> 💡 As you work, capture strategic knowledge about the project — stakeholder priorities,
> domain patterns, business context, external constraints — in §6 Fact Candidates.
> These save the next agent from missing critical context.
>
> **Before writing Fact Candidates, review the conversation history.** The human's
> messages are the primary source — their decisions, priorities, concerns, and domain
> insights. Extract what informs decisions, not implementation details.

Step 6: Expand conventions.md §10.1 examples

Replace the category table:

| Category | Scope | Examples |
|----------|-------|----------|
| `environment` | Where the work lives | servers, tools, platforms, classrooms, labs, hosting |
| `process` | How work gets done | schedules, approvals, reporting cadence, grading cycles |
| `stakeholder` | Who needs what | priorities, pain points, expectations, quotes, key decisions |
| `constraint` | What limits exist | contractual obligations, regulatory deadlines, resource caps, technical limits |
| `convention` | Agreed standards | naming, style, format, language, tone |
| `domain` | Subject matter knowledge | revenue patterns, client segments, market metrics, business rules, curriculum |
| `context` | Background that shapes decisions | market conditions, competitive landscape, regulatory changes, prior decisions |
| `risk` | Known dangers | client concentration, market dependency, knowledge silos, fragile dependencies |

Step 7: Sharpen knowledge.md Phase 2 gather

Replace L32-34:

> **⚠️ Conversation history is the primary source of strategic knowledge.**
> The human's messages contain domain insights, stakeholder priorities, business context,
> and concerns that artifacts miss. Look for decisions, emotions, and data shared during work.
> Technical implementation details belong in tfw-docs — here we capture what informs decisions.

Step 8: Update .tfw/README.md

8a. Add to §v3 additions (after L283 TECH_DEBT.md pipeline bullet):

- **Knowledge consolidation** — Fact Candidates in every artifact capture strategic knowledge (domain, stakeholder, context). `/tfw-knowledge` workflow consolidates them into verified project facts in `knowledge/` topic files, with configurable Knowledge Gate enforcing regular consolidation.

8b. Add knowledge and config to workflows table (L161-170):

| **knowledge** | Coordinator | Consolidate fact candidates → verified project knowledge in `knowledge/` |
| **config** | Coordinator | Interactive config change → propagate to all inline values |

Step 9: Sync adapters

Copy modified workflows to .agent/workflows/: - tfw-research.md ← research.md - tfw-handoff.md ← handoff.md - tfw-knowledge.md ← knowledge.md

5. Acceptance Criteria

  • [ ] RF.md FC prompt says «strategic knowledge» not «next agent's behavior»
  • [ ] REVIEW.md FC prompt matches RF.md
  • [ ] RES.md FC prompt same reframe + keeps «THIS project» filter
  • [ ] research.md §Closure FC bullet reframed
  • [ ] handoff.md FC guidance leads with «stakeholder priorities, domain patterns»
  • [ ] conventions.md §10.1 domain examples include: revenue patterns, client segments, market metrics
  • [ ] conventions.md §10.1 stakeholder examples include: priorities, pain points, quotes
  • [ ] knowledge.md Phase 2 says «strategic knowledge» and mentions «decisions, emotions, data»
  • [ ] .tfw/README.md §v3 lists Knowledge consolidation
  • [ ] .tfw/README.md workflows table includes knowledge and config
  • [ ] All 3 adapters synced (diff = 0)
  • [ ] No file exceeds P10 word limit after changes
  • [ ] Anti-pattern examples include «implementation details» as NOT-FC

6. Verification

# Strategic reframe present
grep -l "strategic knowledge" .tfw/templates/RF.md .tfw/templates/REVIEW.md .tfw/templates/RES.md
grep "strategic knowledge" .tfw/workflows/knowledge.md
grep "strategic knowledge" .tfw/workflows/research.md

# Old framing removed
grep -c "next agent's behavior" .tfw/templates/RF.md  # should be 0
grep -c "next agent's behavior" .tfw/templates/REVIEW.md  # should be 0

# Category examples updated
grep "revenue patterns" .tfw/conventions.md
grep "priorities, pain points" .tfw/conventions.md

# README updated
grep "Knowledge consolidation" .tfw/README.md
grep "knowledge" .tfw/README.md | grep -i "workflow"

# Adapters synced
diff .tfw/workflows/research.md .agent/workflows/tfw-research.md
diff .tfw/workflows/handoff.md .agent/workflows/tfw-handoff.md
diff .tfw/workflows/knowledge.md .agent/workflows/tfw-knowledge.md

# Word count check
wc -w .tfw/workflows/research.md  # should be ≤1200
wc -w .tfw/workflows/knowledge.md  # should be ≤1200

7. Риски фазы

Риск Mitigation
Word count exceeds P10 after edits Pre-calculated +120 words total, all files stay within limits
«Strategic» guidance too vague for engineering projects Examples include both business AND engineering in §10.1
Executor replaces entire FC section instead of targeted edit TS specifies exact replacement text

TS — TFW-18 / Phase B: Knowledge Quality | 2026-04-03