REVIEW — TFW-15: Pipeline Formalization¶
Дата: 2026-04-01 Автор: Reviewer (AI) Verdict: ✅ APPROVE RF: RF TFW-15 TS: TS TFW-15
1. Review Checklist¶
| # | Check | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DoD met? (all TS acceptance criteria) | ✅ | All 12 criteria checked — see §Verification below |
| 2 | Code quality (conventions, naming, type hints) | ✅ | Consistent _DRAFT suffix, role field, YAML structure |
| 3 | Test coverage (tests written and passing) | ✅ | Grep verification: 0 stale 🔵 HL, 0 Phase 3.5 |
| 4 | Philosophy aligned (matches HL design philosophy) | ✅ | Variant D implemented as designed: 8 statuses, implicit approval |
| 5 | Tech debt (shortcuts documented?) | ✅ | 4 observations in RF, all Low severity, correctly scoped as out-of-scope |
| 6 | Security (no secrets exposed, guards in place) | N/A | Documentation-only task |
| 7 | Breaking changes (backward compat, migrations) | ✅ | Archived files untouched. CHANGELOG historical refs preserved |
| 8 | Style & standards (code style, conventions) | ✅ | YAML registry clean, conventions/glossary consistent |
| 9 | Observations collected (executor reported findings) | ✅ | 4 observations documented with type and reasoning |
Verification Details¶
| AC# | Criterion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pipeline string in all 7 locations | ✅ — grep HL_DRAFT: 16 matches across conventions, glossary, README.md, plan.md, research.md, root README |
| 2 | tfw.statuses in config |
✅ — 9 entries (TODO, HL_DRAFT, RES, TS_DRAFT, ONB, RF, REV, DONE, BLOCKED) with role field |
| 3 | conventions.md status table | ✅ — 📝 HL_DRAFT and 🟡 TS_DRAFT at L110, L112 |
| 4 | REJECT branching | ✅ — L127: 🛑 User decides: (a) HL_DRAFT, (b) RES, (c) TS_DRAFT |
| 5 | Concept Taxonomy in glossary | ✅ — L55-63: 5 concepts (Document Type, Template, Workflow, Adapter Command, Status) |
| 6 | plan.md Phase renumber | ✅ — Phase 4: RESEARCH Gate, Phase 5: Decide Scope & Write TS, steps 8/9/10 continuous |
| 7 | research.md Status Transitions | ✅ — L278-280: HL_DRAFT/TS_DRAFT |
| 8 | HL.md template | ✅ — L5: 📝 HL_DRAFT — Ожидает ревью |
| 9 | TS.md template | ✅ — L5: 🟡 TS_DRAFT — Ожидает апрува |
| 10 | Grep 🔵 HL in .tfw/ (excl CHANGELOG) |
✅ — 0 results |
| 11 | Grep Phase 3.5 in .tfw/ (excl CHANGELOG) |
✅ — 0 results |
| 12 | No archived files modified | ✅ — TFW-14 REVIEW diff is unrelated (REVISE→APPROVE from prior session) |
2. Verdict¶
✅ APPROVE
Executor followed TS precisely. All 12 acceptance criteria met. ONB questions were answered correctly, ONB risks (Phase 4 body refs) were caught and addressed. 4 observations are all Low severity and correctly classified as out-of-scope.
3. Tech Debt Collected¶
| # | Source | Severity | File | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD-38 | TFW-15 RF obs. #1 | Low | .tfw/glossary.md L60 |
RESEARCH entry says "between HL and TS" — could say "between HL_DRAFT and TS_DRAFT" for consistency. But this is prose about document types, not statuses — correct as-is | Accepted — document type names, not statuses |
| TD-39 | TFW-15 RF obs. #2 | Low | .tfw/README.md L133-134 |
Step list uses "Write an HL" / "Write a TS" — correct (document types), implicit status reference | Accepted |
| TD-40 | TFW-15 RF obs. #3 | Low | .tfw/conventions.md L222 |
Role Lock table handoff.md row Forbidden column says "code" only — should also list forbidden artifacts |
⬜ Backlog |
| TD-41 | TFW-15 RF obs. #4 | Low | .tfw/workflows/plan.md L155 |
Anti-pattern uses document type names — correct as-is (describes actions on documents) | Accepted |
4. Traces Updated¶
- [x] README Task Board — status to ✅ DONE
- [x] TECH_DEBT.md — TD-38 through TD-41 appended
- [x] tfw-docs: Applied — KNOWLEDGE.md: D20 decision + key artifact + 2 legacy items. TECH_DEBT.md: TD-38..41 + table fix
REVIEW — TFW-15: Pipeline Formalization | 2026-04-01