RF — TFW-14: Research Interaction Model¶
Дата: 2026-04-01 Автор: Executor (AI) Статус: 🟢 RF — Выполнено Parent HL: HL-TFW-14 TS: TS TFW-14
1. What was done¶
| # | File | Action | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | .tfw/workflows/research.md |
MODIFY | Briefing Protocol (§ before Process), Stage Handoff (checkpoint extension), Closure Protocol (§ after Final Checkpoint), Sufficiency Check (replaces Complexity Check), 3 new Hard Rules (#5-7), 4 new Anti-patterns, per-stage→per-turn in Limits table + Hard Rule #4 |
| 2 | .tfw/templates/RES.md |
MODIFY | Briefing section (plan, scope intent, guiding questions) after Research Context; Closure section (HL recommendations table, next step) before Conclusion; Sufficiency Check replaces Complexity Check; Verdict wording updated |
| 3 | .tfw/workflows/plan.md |
MODIFY | Phase 3.5 rewritten: pros/cons format, default=recommend research, HL update gate after RESEARCH, separate session recommendation; 2 new Anti-patterns |
| 4 | .claude/commands/tfw-research.md |
MODIFY | Step 4 synced: Briefing → Stages → Closure structure, turn-based rhythm, Sufficiency for HL finalization |
| 5 | .agent/workflows/tfw-research.md |
MODIFY | Step 4 synced: identical to Claude Code adapter |
Budget: 0 new files, 5 modifications. Within scope.
2. Deviations from TS¶
| # | TS says | What I did | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TS does not mention Limits table (L183) | Updated Questions to user per stage → per turn |
ONB Recommendation #1: direct consequence of turn-based rhythm change. Without this, Limits table contradicts new Hard Rule #4 |
| 2 | TS does not mention Verdict wording (L135) | Updated Sufficient for TS / Need another pass → Sufficient for HL finalization / Need another pass |
ONB Recommendation #2: Verdict line is part of the same Final Checkpoint block being modified |
| 3 | TS does not mention Hard Rule #4 (L151) | Updated per stage → per turn |
ONB Risk #1: old wording directly contradicts the new turn-based rhythm |
All deviations are consistency fixes within the same file, approved in ONB.
3. Test results¶
No automated tests. Manual verification: - ✅ All 5 files modified as specified - ✅ Briefing Protocol: 10 lines in research.md, anchored in RES.md template - ✅ Stage Handoff: 2 lines added to checkpoint step (step 5 + sub-bullet) - ✅ Closure Protocol: separate section with 4 steps + 2 callout blocks - ✅ Sufficiency Check: self-check list (4 items) replaces Complexity Check - ✅ Hard Rules: 7 rules (3 new: #5 briefing, #6 closure, #7 sufficiency) - ✅ Anti-patterns: 14 total (4 new: skip-briefing, rush-bias, no-closure, skip-bias) - ✅ RES.md: Briefing section (17 lines), Closure section (8 lines) - ✅ plan.md: Phase 3.5 restructured, 2 new anti-patterns - ✅ Adapters: both identical, 6 lines replacing 4 - ✅ Per-stage→per-turn consistency: Hard Rule #4, Limits table, Anti-patterns
4. Known limitations¶
- No live validation. Changes are structural (markdown workflow), not code. The true test is the next
/tfw-researchsession — will the agent follow Briefing and Closure? This requires a real task. - Standalone mode. TS explicitly excludes standalone research. Closure Protocol references HL update, which doesn't apply to standalone. Current wording says "Research agent writes recommendations; coordinator applies them" — reasonable for both modes, but standalone may feel awkward.
5. Observations (out-of-scope, not modified)¶
| # | File | Line(s) | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | .tfw/workflows/research.md |
L27 | style | This process gives birth to the details needed for TS — still references TS as the primary output. With Closure Protocol, the primary output is now HL update recommendations. Consider rewording to mention HL |
| 2 | .tfw/glossary.md |
L60 | naming | RESEARCH glossary entry says "Optional — user can skip with confirmation." This is accurate but doesn't mention the new pros/cons format or default recommendation. Minor sync opportunity |
| 3 | .tfw/glossary.md |
L66 | naming | Pass definition says "Minimum 1 pass required" — still references old model. With Sufficiency Check, the framing is now "sufficient for HL finalization" which is slightly different intent |
| 4 | .tfw/conventions.md |
L50 | naming | RES artifact description: "Living document: decisions and questions at the top, stage logs below" — doesn't mention Briefing or Closure sections. Template now has them |
RF — TFW-14: Research Interaction Model | 2026-04-01