Дата: 2026-04-03 Автор: Reviewer (AI) Verdict: ✅ APPROVE RF: RF TFW-18 TS: TS TFW-18
| # | Check | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DoD met? (all TS acceptance criteria) | ✅ | All 16 acceptance criteria verified — templates, workflows, infrastructure, config, glossary, conventions, adapters. Grep + file inspection confirmed. |
| 2 | Code quality (conventions, naming, type hints) | ✅ | All new files follow TFW naming conventions. Templates use correct section numbering. YAML valid. Markdown clean. |
| 3 | Test coverage (tests written and passing) | ✅/N/A | Task is markdown-only. No code tests applicable. Grep verification substitutes. |
| 4 | Philosophy aligned (matches HL design philosophy) | ✅ | Captures the 6 HL design principles: decoupled lifecycle, quality filter, progressive adoption, scalability via topic files, configurability, Dream-like 4-phase process. |
| 5 | Tech debt (shortcuts documented?) | ✅ | 3 observations documented in RF §5. conventions.md numbering (§10.1/§10.2) is the only notable shortcut — correctly flagged. |
| 6 | Security (no secrets exposed, guards in place) | ✅/N/A | No secrets. .user_preferences.md correctly documented as gitignored. |
| 7 | Breaking changes (backward compat, migrations) | ✅ | No breaking changes. All additions are additive — new sections appended to existing templates, new Phase 0 placed before Phase 1 (doesn’t alter existing flow). Existing RF/REVIEW/RES files are NOT backfilled (explicitly out of scope). |
| 8 | Style & standards (code style, conventions) | ✅ | Fact Candidates sections use consistent format across all 3 templates. Mindset reminders are uniform 💡 callout style. knowledge.md follows the established workflow file pattern (YAML frontmatter, role lock, anti-patterns). |
| 9 | Observations collected (executor reported findings) | ✅ | 3 observations + 3 fact candidates — well-documented, actionable. |
✅ APPROVE
Execution is precise and complete. All 14 TS steps implemented across 3 phases, plus adapter sync. The executor correctly identified and resolved the TS inconsistency (REVIEW.md §4 naming — TS said “§4 Verdict” but actual §4 is “Traces Updated”) with the right placement decision. The .user_preferences.md interpretation (guidance in init.md rather than actual file creation) matches the HL intent.
The knowledge.md workflow is well-structured — 101 lines, includes role lock, behavior rules, anti-patterns, and user approval gates at Phase 2 and Phase 3. This matches the “Dream-like” 4-phase process from the HL.
| # | Source | Severity | File | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD-45 | TFW-18 RF obs. #1 | Low | .tfw/conventions.md |
§10.1 and §10.2 subsection numbering breaks the flat numbering scheme (§1-§15). Future renumbering pass needed | → backlog |
| TD-46 | TFW-18 RF obs. #2 | Low | .tfw/workflows/init.md |
Phase 5 verify checklist references old step numbers after .user_preferences.md insertion shifted 5→6, 6→7 | → backlog |
| TD-47 | TFW-18 RF obs. #3 | Low | KNOWLEDGE.md |
Live KNOWLEDGE.md missing §5 Project Facts — template has it, project file doesn’t yet. Will appear on first /tfw-knowledge run |
→ first /tfw-knowledge run |
Was this a significant task? YES — new workflow, new infrastructure, new artifact sections, new glossary terms, new conventions subsections.
| # | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Architecture changed? | Yes — knowledge/ folder, .tfw/knowledge_state.yaml, /tfw-knowledge workflow added. Already documented in conventions.md §10.2 by executor. |
| 2 | New decision (D-record)? | No — all decisions were in HL/RES. No new architecture decisions emerged during execution. |
| 3 | Something deprecated/dropped? | No |
| 4 | New tech debt discovered? | Yes — TD-45, TD-46, TD-47 added above |
| 5 | New principle or convention? | Yes — Fact Categories table (conventions §10.1) and Knowledge Infrastructure (§10.2) already added by executor |
| 6 | Fact Candidates present? | Yes — 3 candidates in RF §6. Will be processed during first /tfw-knowledge run |
tfw-docs: Applied — executor already updated conventions.md (§10.1, §10.2) and glossary.md (4 terms) as part of TS scope. No additional KNOWLEDGE.md updates needed beyond the §5 addition that will happen on first /tfw-knowledge run.
Record what you learned about this project that would change how the NEXT agent approaches a similar task. If it wouldn’t change their decision — don’t record it.
| # | Category | Candidate | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | process | TFW-18 is the first task that uses the Fact Candidates section in its own RF — it bootstraps itself. Future agents should know that the section format is validated by this task’s own output. | RF §6 observation | High |
| 2 | convention | TS Step 2 text said “After §4 Verdict” but the actual REVIEW.md §4 is “Traces Updated” — TS descriptions of existing file structure can drift from reality. Executors should always verify actual file content, not trust TS descriptions of it. | ONB §6 inconsistency report | High |
Categories (open list):
environment,process,stakeholder,constraint,convention,domain,context,risk
fact-candidates: processed 2026-04-03
| *REVIEW — TFW-18: Knowledge Consolidation | 2026-04-03* |