trace-first-starter

REVIEW — TFW-8 / Phase B: Documentation Sync

Date: 2026-03-12 Author: Reviewer (AI) Verdict: ✅ APPROVE RF: RF Phase B TS: TS TFW-8


1. Review Checklist

# Check Status Notes
1 DoD met? (all TS acceptance criteria) All 5 Phase B criteria verified — see details below
2 Code quality (conventions, naming, type hints) N/A No code — Markdown documentation
3 Test coverage (tests written and passing) 9 test checks in RF, all independently verified
4 Philosophy aligned (matches HL design philosophy) All references now consistently mention review as separate workflow and Reviewer as distinct role
5 Tech debt (shortcuts documented?) 3 observations documented, triaged below
6 Security (no secrets exposed, guards in place) N/A Documentation changes only
7 Observability N/A No runtime components
8 Breaking changes (backward compat, migrations) Non-breaking — only added references, no removals
9 Observations collected (executor reported findings) 3 valid observations

Verification Details

# Acceptance Criterion Result Evidence
1 .tfw/README.md directory tree, workflows table, evolution updated L77 “review” in workflow list; L169 review/Reviewer row in table; L205 4 roles; L212 Reviewer; L283 review in evolution
2 plan.md mentions /tfw-review after handoff L76 small task path; L87-88 multi-phase diagram; L112, L117 references
3 resume.md mentions review step L84 step 15 — review workflow reference after handoff
4 init.md review in copy instructions and workflow lists L98 copy command; L185 workflow reference; L193 template structure
5 Antigravity adapter README has review in setup, listing, sync L22 setup copy; L41 directory listing; L54 sync section

2. Verdict

✅ APPROVE

Phase B complete. All documentation references across the project now consistently reflect the review workflow and Reviewer role. Combined with Phase A’s structural changes, TFW-8 is fully delivered:

Task TFW-8 is ready for closure.

3. Tech Debt Collected

# Source Severity File Description Action
TD-14 RF obs. #1 Low .tfw/README.md L214 “one AI agent fills both Coordinator and Executor roles” — doesn’t mention Reviewer for small projects Accepted — small projects may self-review; sentence is accurate
TD-15 RF obs. #2 Low .tfw/README.md L252 Anti-patterns says “Coordinator skips review” — could say “Reviewer” Accepted — “Coordinator skips review” still valid (coordinator initiates the review step)
TD-16 RF obs. #3 Low .tfw/CHANGELOG.md L31 Historical v0.2.0 entry says “3 canonical workflows” Accepted — historical record, accurate for that version

4. Traces Updated


*REVIEW — TFW-8 / Phase B: Documentation Sync 2026-03-12*