ONB — TFW-6 / Phase B: Workflows
Date: 2026-03-12
Author: Executor (AI)
Status: 🟠 ONB — Awaiting answers
Parent HL: HL-TFW-6
TS: TS Phase B
1. Understanding
Phase B creates two canonical workflows (tfw-release, tfw-update) in .tfw/workflows/, their Antigravity adapter copies in .agent/workflows/, and updates conventions.md (§8 Workflows table + §2 Required Artifacts) and glossary.md (5 new terms). All content is specified verbatim in the TS.
2. Entry Points
| File |
Action |
Notes |
.tfw/workflows/release.md |
CREATE |
General release process, references RELEASE.md |
.tfw/workflows/update.md |
CREATE |
Downstream upgrade process with 🟢🟡🔴 categorization |
.agent/workflows/tfw-release.md |
CREATE |
Identical copy of release.md |
.agent/workflows/tfw-update.md |
CREATE |
Identical copy of update.md |
.tfw/conventions.md |
MODIFY |
§8 table + §2 RELEASE.md entry |
.tfw/glossary.md |
MODIFY |
5 new terms |
3. Questions (blocking — cannot proceed without answers)
| # |
Question |
Answer |
| — |
No blocking questions. TS content is fully specified. |
— |
4. Recommendations (suggestions, not blocking)
- TS Step numbering skip. TS §4 labels steps as “Step 1, 2, 3 (adapter copies), 4, 5” but combines adapter creation into one step (Step 3). Conventions.md update is labeled “Step 4” and glossary update is “Step 5”. I will follow TS step labels exactly.
5. Risks Found (edge cases, potential issues not in TS)
- Nested code fences in release.md. The release workflow TS contains a Markdown code block inside the workflow content (the CHANGELOG entry template uses triple backticks). Since the workflow file itself is Markdown, this is fine — they are at different nesting levels. No issue.
6. Inconsistencies with Code (spec vs reality)
- conventions.md §8 is titled “Workflows” but uses a different table structure than TS. Current §8 has columns
Workflow | Role | Purpose — which matches the TS exactly. No inconsistency.
| *ONB — TFW-6 / Phase B: Workflows |
2026-03-12* |