Date: 2026-04-04 Author: Reviewer Verdict: ✅ APPROVE RF: RF__TFW-24 TS: TS__TFW-24
| # | Check | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DoD met? (all TS acceptance criteria) | ✅ | 17/17 criteria met. All verified against actual files |
| 2 | Code quality (conventions, naming, type hints) | ✅ | All Role Lock labels, table formats, and naming follow established conventions |
| 3 | Test coverage (tests written and passing) | ✅ | Grep verified: 0 occurrences of “Coordinator (Research Mode)”. Word count verified: 600 words. Adapter diffs: all 3 identical |
| 4 | Philosophy aligned (matches HL design philosophy) | ✅ | P1 (one role, one artifact), P2 (filesystem = state machine), P3 (synthesis not aggregation), P4 (resume from anywhere) — all implemented |
| 5 | Tech debt (shortcuts documented?) | ✅ | 3 observations documented in RF §5 |
| 6 | Security (no secrets exposed, guards in place) | N/A | Markdown-only project |
| 7 | Breaking changes (backward compat, migrations) | ✅ | Existing filled RES files in tasks/ unaffected. Workflows reference §numbers. New research subfolder convention is additive. No breaking changes |
| 8 | Style & standards (code style, conventions) | ✅ | English-only headings per D29. Stage file naming per D28/D5 |
| 9 | Observations collected (executor reported findings) | ✅ | 3 observations: §10 numbering, glossary RESEARCH duplication, Step numbering/Synthesis naming |
✅ APPROVE
Clean execution. The core deliverables — Researcher role extraction, subfolder state machine, Resume Protocol, RES synthesis format, HL template updates (Vision/Impact/stakeholder Quote, “Why Not Just…?”) — are all implemented correctly.
The executor found a smart compression: merging Final Checkpoint into Synthesis (saving ~30 words). The step renumbering (0-6 instead of 1-7) is clean. OODA ACT updated from “Update RES” to “Update stage file” — correct logical consequence of subfolder architecture.
base.md at exactly 600 words = tight but within budget.
| # | Source | Severity | File | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD-60 | RF obs. #1 | Low | .tfw/conventions.md L129 |
§10.1, §10.2, §10 numbered out of order — inherited from previous tasks | ⬜ Backlog |
| TD-61 | RF obs. #2 | Low | .tfw/glossary.md L66 |
RESEARCH entry says “Optional — user can skip with confirmation” — duplicates plan.md Step 6 logic. Minor inconsistency | ⬜ Backlog |
| TD-62 | RF obs. #3 + review | Med | .tfw/conventions.md L292-303 |
Hard Stop Rule only covers Coordinator→Executor and Executor→Reviewer transitions. Missing: Researcher→Coordinator (“Research complete → /tfw-plan”). The base.md STOP instruction handles it, but conventions §15 Hard Stop Rule should list all 3 transitions for completeness | ⬜ Backlog |
| # | Category | Candidate | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | process | TFW now has 4 roles: Coordinator, Researcher, Executor, Reviewer. Researcher was extracted from Coordinator following the same pattern as TFW-8 (Reviewer extraction). Role split triggered by crash recovery failures (TFW-23: 6/6 gates violated) and user confusion during TFW-24 planning | HL-TFW-24, RF FC#1, session discussion | High |
| 2 | convention | Research uses filesystem-level state machine: research/ subfolder with briefing.md, gather.md, extract.md, challenge.md. File existence = stage completion. No parsing, no format compliance needed. External validation: “Artifact-Based Validation” pattern |
RES D1, RF FC#2, conventions.md §4 | High |
| 3 | convention | Final RES = synthesis document with different structure from stage files. Prevents copy-paste, forces integrated thinking. Term: “Synthesis” for the consolidation step (base.md Step 6) | RES D2, RF FC#3 | High |
| 4 | convention | HL template §1 uses Amazon Working Backwards elements: Vision narrative (“write as if done”), Impact field, stakeholder perspective Quote (press release pattern). §10 has “Why Not Just…?” section (internal FAQ pattern) — forces alternatives consideration before research | TS Step 5, session discussion | High |
| 5 | process | User insight: “дело не в формате, дело в структурности процесса” — structural enforcement (file existence) beats format enforcement (state tables, checkboxes). Applied to research subfolder design | RES D1 user quote, session | High |
| *REVIEW — TFW-24: Researcher Role & RES State Machine | 2026-04-04* |