Дата: 2026-04-03 Автор: Reviewer (AI) Статус: 🔍 REV Parent HL: HL Phase B TS: TS Phase B RF: RF Phase B
| # | Check | Result | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DoD met? | ✅ | Original 13 AC from TS all verified by RF. Additional scope (Human-Only Test, Quality bar) applied by coordinator post-RF |
| 2 | Code quality | ✅ | All changes are markdown text — consistent format, no typos |
| 3 | Test coverage | ✅ | grep verification confirms all keywords present in correct files |
| 4 | Philosophy aligned | ✅ | P1 (tfw-docs ≠ tfw-knowledge), P2 (chat = primary source), P3 (domain-agnostic examples) — all upheld |
| 5 | Tech debt | ⚠️ | 2 observations from RF triaged below |
| 6 | Security | N/A | |
| 7 | Observability | N/A | |
| 8 | Breaking changes | ⚠️ | FC prompt changed — agents downstream will see new guidance. Not breaking (additive) |
| 9 | Style & standards | ✅ | Adapters synced (4 workflows, all diff = 0). Word counts: research 1165, knowledge 748, handoff 912, review 750 — all ≤1200 |
Post-RF, the user identified that agents also generate filler facts and tech debt. Coordinator (same session) applied additional changes:
These changes are consistent with Phase B HL philosophy but were not in the original TS. This is acceptable because user explicitly requested them and they’re the same type of work (template text edits).
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
strategic knowledge in 3 templates |
✅ RF=1, REVIEW=1, RES=1 |
next agent's behavior removed from templates |
✅ RF=0, REVIEW=0, RES=0 |
Human-Only Test in 4 files |
✅ RF, REVIEW, RES, knowledge.md |
Quality bar in 2 files |
✅ RF, handoff |
Quality filter in review.md |
✅ |
revenue patterns in conventions.md |
✅ in §10.1 domain row |
priorities, pain points in conventions.md |
✅ in §10.1 stakeholder row |
Knowledge consolidation in .tfw/README.md |
✅ in §v3 |
strategic knowledge in research.md |
✅ in §Closure |
| All 4 adapters synced (diff = 0) | ✅ research, handoff, knowledge, review |
| Word counts ≤1200 | ✅ max = research 1165 |
| # | Source | Severity | File | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RF-B obs. #1 | Low | .tfw/README.md L77 |
§Project Structure tree still lists old workflow set — doesn’t include knowledge/config. Only §Canonical Workflows table was updated | ⬜ Backlog |
| 2 | RF-B obs. #2 | Low | .tfw/workflows/review.md L79 |
review.md Step 4 FC reminder still uses old «project knowledge» framing — not updated to «strategic knowledge» because it was out of TS scope | ⬜ Backlog |
Human-Only Test: would this fact be unknown without the human saying it?
| # | Category | Candidate | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | stakeholder | User explicitly distinguishes tfw-docs (technical, for agents) from tfw-knowledge (strategic, for decisions). Agents generating “Unicode on Windows” as FC is a failure mode — knowledge should be what only humans can provide about business, clients, processes | User message: “это информация стратегическая, а не правила юникада на винде” | High |
| 2 | process | The best fact candidates come from user frustration/emotion in chat, not from structured artifact sections. User said “злится, радуется или делится полезной инфой во время ресерча” — this is the primary signal for strategic knowledge | User message during planning | High |
Phase B achieved its primary goal: FC guidance reframed from technical to strategic across all templates and workflows. The Human-Only Test and Quality bar (added post-RF by user request) strengthen the system further.
tfw-docs: Applied — see below
| *REVIEW — TFW-18 / Phase B: Knowledge Quality | 2026-04-03* |