Дата: 2026-04-01
Автор: Reviewer (AI)
Verdict: ✅ APPROVE
RF: RF TFW-15
TS: TS TFW-15
1. Review Checklist
| # |
Check |
Status |
Notes |
| 1 |
DoD met? (all TS acceptance criteria) |
✅ |
All 12 criteria checked — see §Verification below |
| 2 |
Code quality (conventions, naming, type hints) |
✅ |
Consistent _DRAFT suffix, role field, YAML structure |
| 3 |
Test coverage (tests written and passing) |
✅ |
Grep verification: 0 stale 🔵 HL, 0 Phase 3.5 |
| 4 |
Philosophy aligned (matches HL design philosophy) |
✅ |
Variant D implemented as designed: 8 statuses, implicit approval |
| 5 |
Tech debt (shortcuts documented?) |
✅ |
4 observations in RF, all Low severity, correctly scoped as out-of-scope |
| 6 |
Security (no secrets exposed, guards in place) |
N/A |
Documentation-only task |
| 7 |
Breaking changes (backward compat, migrations) |
✅ |
Archived files untouched. CHANGELOG historical refs preserved |
| 8 |
Style & standards (code style, conventions) |
✅ |
YAML registry clean, conventions/glossary consistent |
| 9 |
Observations collected (executor reported findings) |
✅ |
4 observations documented with type and reasoning |
Verification Details
| AC# |
Criterion |
Result |
| 1 |
Pipeline string in all 7 locations |
✅ — grep HL_DRAFT: 16 matches across conventions, glossary, README.md, plan.md, research.md, root README |
| 2 |
tfw.statuses in config |
✅ — 9 entries (TODO, HL_DRAFT, RES, TS_DRAFT, ONB, RF, REV, DONE, BLOCKED) with role field |
| 3 |
conventions.md status table |
✅ — 📝 HL_DRAFT and 🟡 TS_DRAFT at L110, L112 |
| 4 |
REJECT branching |
✅ — L127: 🛑 User decides: (a) HL_DRAFT, (b) RES, (c) TS_DRAFT |
| 5 |
Concept Taxonomy in glossary |
✅ — L55-63: 5 concepts (Document Type, Template, Workflow, Adapter Command, Status) |
| 6 |
plan.md Phase renumber |
✅ — Phase 4: RESEARCH Gate, Phase 5: Decide Scope & Write TS, steps 8/9/10 continuous |
| 7 |
research.md Status Transitions |
✅ — L278-280: HL_DRAFT/TS_DRAFT |
| 8 |
HL.md template |
✅ — L5: 📝 HL_DRAFT — Ожидает ревью |
| 9 |
TS.md template |
✅ — L5: 🟡 TS_DRAFT — Ожидает апрува |
| 10 |
Grep 🔵 HL in .tfw/ (excl CHANGELOG) |
✅ — 0 results |
| 11 |
Grep Phase 3.5 in .tfw/ (excl CHANGELOG) |
✅ — 0 results |
| 12 |
No archived files modified |
✅ — TFW-14 REVIEW diff is unrelated (REVISE→APPROVE from prior session) |
2. Verdict
✅ APPROVE
Executor followed TS precisely. All 12 acceptance criteria met. ONB questions were answered correctly, ONB risks (Phase 4 body refs) were caught and addressed. 4 observations are all Low severity and correctly classified as out-of-scope.
3. Tech Debt Collected
| # |
Source |
Severity |
File |
Description |
Action |
| TD-38 |
TFW-15 RF obs. #1 |
Low |
.tfw/glossary.md L60 |
RESEARCH entry says “between HL and TS” — could say “between HL_DRAFT and TS_DRAFT” for consistency. But this is prose about document types, not statuses — correct as-is |
Accepted — document type names, not statuses |
| TD-39 |
TFW-15 RF obs. #2 |
Low |
.tfw/README.md L133-134 |
Step list uses “Write an HL” / “Write a TS” — correct (document types), implicit status reference |
Accepted |
| TD-40 |
TFW-15 RF obs. #3 |
Low |
.tfw/conventions.md L222 |
Role Lock table handoff.md row Forbidden column says “code” only — should also list forbidden artifacts |
⬜ Backlog |
| TD-41 |
TFW-15 RF obs. #4 |
Low |
.tfw/workflows/plan.md L155 |
Anti-pattern uses document type names — correct as-is (describes actions on documents) |
Accepted |
4. Traces Updated
| *REVIEW — TFW-15: Pipeline Formalization |
2026-04-01* |