trace-first-starter

REVIEW — TFW-14: Research Interaction Model

Дата: 2026-04-01 Автор: Coordinator (AI) — Reviewer Verdict: ✅ APPROVE (after REVISE) RF: RF TFW-14 TS: TS TFW-14

---

1. Review Checklist

#	Check	Status	Notes
1	DoD met?	⚠️	10/12 criteria met. 2 issues found (see §2)
2	Code quality	✅	Markdown follows conventions. Consistent formatting
3	Test coverage	N/A	Process/documentation task — no automated tests applicable
4	Philosophy aligned	⚠️	Core change implemented. But residual “TS” framing survives in research.md L26 — contradicts the HL principle “Research → HL, not TS”
5	Tech debt	✅	4 observations properly documented in RF §5
6	Security	N/A	No security surface
7	Breaking changes	✅	No backward compat issues — workflow additions only
8	Style & standards	✅	Follows TFW naming, section structure conventions
9	Observations collected	✅	4 observations, all valid

2. Verdict

🔄 REVISE

Execution covers all 5 files and the structural changes are solid. Briefing, Closure, Stage Handoff, Sufficiency Check, and skip-bias fix are all present and well-integrated. ONB recommendations addressed (3 deviations, all justified). Adapters synced correctly.

However, two issues require a revision pass:

Items to fix:

1. research.md L26 — residual “TS” framing. Line says: "This process gives birth to the details needed for TS." This directly contradicts the HL principle #3: “Research → HL. Обновление HL = основной выход research, не опция.” The executor flagged this in RF Observations #1 but did not fix it (correctly — it was out of scope per Role Lock). However, the TS should have included this line in Step 1 or Step 4. Fix: reword to reference HL finalization.

2. RF quality — no evidence of formulation review. RF says “✅ Briefing Protocol: 10 lines in research.md” — counts lines but doesn’t quote or evaluate the text. For a process/documentation task, the reviewer needs to see key formulations. RF should include at least 1-2 representative snippets per major change so the reviewer can assess quality without opening every file. This is a process observation, not a blocking issue for this specific task.

DoD Status (12 items):

#	Criterion	Status	Evidence
1	Briefing Protocol with turn-based rhythm	✅	research.md L51-65. Turn-based documented, ≤3 per turn
2	Checkpoint with Stage Handoff	✅	research.md L116-118. +2 lines: plan + question
3	Closure Protocol (HL recommendations)	✅	research.md L161-172. 4 steps + 2 callouts
4	Sufficiency Check for HL finalization	✅	research.md L148-158. Self-check list (4 items)
5	Hard Rules + Anti-patterns	✅	research.md L184-190 (rules), L248-251 (anti-patterns)
6	RES.md Briefing + Closure	✅	RES.md L14-30 (Briefing), L88-95 (Closure)
7	plan.md HL update gate	✅	plan.md L81: explicit coordinator reads RES → updates HL → user confirms
8	plan.md skip-bias fix	✅	plan.md L72-76: pros/cons, default=run, user decides
9	Claude adapter synced	✅	.claude/commands/tfw-research.md L30-35: Briefing → Stages → Closure
10	Antigravity adapter synced	✅	.agent/workflows/tfw-research.md L36-41: identical to Claude
11	Adapters both identical	✅	Content identical (Step 4 section)
12	Observations section	✅	RF §5: 4 observations documented

Blocking: Item #1 (L26 wording) — FIXED in REVISE pass. L26 now reads: “This process refines the HL — turning assumptions into decisions.”

Also fixed in REVISE: Example Flow added (46 lines), Limits table → values+pointer to PROJECT_CONFIG, max_questions_per_stage → max_questions_per_turn in PROJECT_CONFIG.yaml, RES.md template enhanced with inline examples.

Non-blocking: Item #2 (RF quality) — process feedback for future tasks.

3. Tech Debt Collected

#	Source	Severity	File	Description	Action
TD-34	RF obs. #1	Med	research.md L26	“gives birth to the details needed for TS” — still references TS as primary output. Should reference HL. This is the REVISE item	→ REVISE
TD-35	RF obs. #2	Low	glossary.md L60	RESEARCH entry doesn’t mention pros/cons format or default recommendation	→ backlog
TD-36	RF obs. #3	Low	glossary.md L66	Pass definition uses old model, doesn’t mention “sufficient for HL finalization”	→ backlog
TD-37	RF obs. #4	Low	conventions.md L50	RES artifact description doesn’t mention Briefing or Closure sections	→ backlog

4. Traces Updated

• README Task Board — awaiting REVISE completion
• HL status — no change needed (already ✅)
• TECH_DEBT.md — TD-34 through TD-37 to be appended
• tfw-docs: Applied — updated KNOWLEDGE.md §Decisions (D19), §Key Artifacts (TFW-14), §Legacy (Complexity Check)

---

*REVIEW — TFW-14: Research Interaction Model

2026-04-01*

This site is open source. Improve this page.